Search found 12 matches
- 2008-08-28 17:38
- Forum: FileZilla Client Support
- Topic: Error: Failed to retrieve directory listing
- Replies: 51
- Views: 144641
Re: Error: Failed to retrieve directory listing
Server types "VMS", "DOS", "HP NonStop" all retrieve the initial directory listing on the server (which is a Windows 2000-based box under the hood). Of those, however, only "DOS" allows me to list the contents of folders other than the initial folder. Once con...
- 2008-08-28 15:33
- Forum: FileZilla Client Support
- Topic: Error: Failed to retrieve directory listing
- Replies: 51
- Views: 144641
Re: Error: Failed to retrieve directory listing
I've used FZ for years, and until recently had few problems. Since upgrading to 3.1.1.1 last week, FZ seems no longer able to retrieve a directory listing from my primary SFTP server. Prior to upgrading, I was running 3.1.0.1 without problems. The 3.1.2-rc1 build behaves the same as 3.1.1.1. I've tr...
- 2007-09-04 16:52
- Forum: FileZilla Client Support
- Topic: SFTP difference between 2.2.32 and 3.0rc1
- Replies: 18
- Views: 5840
- 2007-08-30 19:09
- Forum: FileZilla Client Support
- Topic: SFTP difference between 2.2.32 and 3.0rc1
- Replies: 18
- Views: 5840
- 2007-08-28 15:03
- Forum: FileZilla Client Support
- Topic: SFTP difference between 2.2.32 and 3.0rc1
- Replies: 18
- Views: 5840
- 2007-08-27 15:03
- Forum: FileZilla Client Support
- Topic: SFTP difference between 2.2.32 and 3.0rc1
- Replies: 18
- Views: 5840
Unfortunately, no. That's completely out of my hands. It's a box that I have no control over and it would be more than just getting a guest account since it is configured to only accept connections from specific IPs, too...botg wrote:Would it be possible to get a temporary guest account on that server?
- 2007-08-27 13:45
- Forum: FileZilla Client Support
- Topic: SFTP difference between 2.2.32 and 3.0rc1
- Replies: 18
- Views: 5840
Please try the upcoming 2007-08-24 nightly from http://filezilla-project.org/nightly.php I've downloaded and installed the nightly from 2007-08-27, and it still shows the same behavior as the previous RC1 I had installed (the listing from the server shows as empty, even though it is not). Here is t...
- 2007-08-23 14:37
- Forum: FileZilla Client Support
- Topic: SFTP difference between 2.2.32 and 3.0rc1
- Replies: 18
- Views: 5840
Okay, now we know that it isn't a problem with PuTTY but with FileZilla instead. What I need now is the raw output of fzsftp Start fzsftp using this command: (Replace username and host with your's) fzsftp.exe -v username@example.com Then after connecting, enter these commands: -1- -0- password ls (...
- 2007-08-20 18:42
- Forum: FileZilla Client Support
- Topic: SFTP difference between 2.2.32 and 3.0rc1
- Replies: 18
- Views: 5840
- 2007-08-20 17:40
- Forum: FileZilla Client Support
- Topic: SFTP difference between 2.2.32 and 3.0rc1
- Replies: 18
- Views: 5840
Actually the listing format isn't the problem. On second look it appears that the server doesn't send any listing at all. FileZilla's SFTP support is based upon PuTTY. Please try the most recent psftp build from PuTTY (http://www.tartarus.org/~simon/putty-snapshots/x86/psftp.exe) with your server. ...
- 2007-08-20 17:23
- Forum: FileZilla Client Support
- Topic: SFTP difference between 2.2.32 and 3.0rc1
- Replies: 18
- Views: 5840
Your server uses a very exotic listing format. I'll try to add it to the directorylisting parser of FZ3. @botg: Thanks for the quick response. At the risk of exposing even more of my ignorance, could I read this as indicating that there were things in the 2.2.x series that have gotten deferred or l...
- 2007-08-20 16:26
- Forum: FileZilla Client Support
- Topic: SFTP difference between 2.2.32 and 3.0rc1
- Replies: 18
- Views: 5840
SFTP difference between 2.2.32 and 3.0rc1
We've been using the 3.0 betas, etc., since their initial release with very few issues until recently. Our server admins are switching over to SFTP and completely disabling FTP, so we tried connecting via SFTP and bumped into what appears to be a problem with 3.0 that doesn't seem to be present in t...