problem with download a file over 4GB

Message

xjj555 · #1 Post by **xjj555** » 2004-10-14 22:39

the log like this:
---------------------------------------------
Status: Starting download of /fedora/linux/core/2/i386/iso/FC2-i386-DVD.iso
Command: TYPE I
Response: 200 Switching to Binary mode.
Command: PORT 218,82,60,145,7,56
Response: 200 PORT command successful. Consider using PASV.
Command: REST 4294965912
Response: 350 Restart position accepted (4294965912).
Command: RETR FC2-i386-DVD.iso
Response: 150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for FC2-i386-DVD.iso (4370640896 bytes).
Error:
Error: Download failed
--------------------------------------------I have check this forum and q&a, and I didn't find the answer

xjj555 · #2 Post by **xjj555** » 2004-10-14 22:41

My version is 2.2.8d.
thx for your help!

eyebex · #3 Post by **eyebex** » 2004-10-15 01:09

what operating system / file system are you using? maybe your current file system (e.g. "fat32") doesn't support files larger than 4 gb ... in that case you really should use the much better "ntfs".

Golyc · #4 Post by **Golyc** » 2004-10-15 02:39

eyebex wrote:what operating system / file system are you using? maybe your current file system (e.g. "fat32") doesn't support files larger than 4 gb ... in that case you really should use the much better "ntfs".

recently i read an article that afirms twich in speedy matter fat32 is better, but it don´t suport partition over 36 gb (if memory don´t fail) and as you sad no files bigger than 4gb

The nfts limitation is VERY bigger but the speedy is amost 5% less

eyebex · #5 Post by **eyebex** » 2004-10-15 09:11

FAT32's performance is only higher than NTFS' on small volumes. It turns around on large volumes. In addition, FAT32 wastes more space on larger volumes due to larger cluster sizes. For a nice comparison see: http://www.ntfs.com/ntfs_vs_fat.htm

xjj555 · #6 Post by **xjj555** » 2004-10-16 06:47

yeah
I have used the "conver" command to change my file system to ntfs and complete the download.
thank you guys!