Patch for PRET-Support in Filezilla 3.3.3
Moderator: Project members
Re: Patch for PRET-Support in Filezilla 3.3.3
There's no formal and consistent specification for PRET. Hence it just cannot be implemented.
Re: Patch for PRET-Support in Filezilla 3.3.3
Anyone know how to update this "patch" to be added to the latest version of Filezilla's source code to compile correctly? I'm getting this:
ftpcontrolsocket.cpp:99:2: error: expected ‘}’ before ‘rawtransfer_rest’
rawtransfer_rest,
^
ftpcontrolsocket.cpp:105:1: error: expected initializer before ‘}’ token
};
^
ftpcontrolsocket.cpp:105:1: error: expected declaration before ‘}’ token
Makefile:667: recipe for target 'libengine_a-ftpcontrolsocket.o' failed
ftpcontrolsocket.cpp:99:2: error: expected ‘}’ before ‘rawtransfer_rest’
rawtransfer_rest,
^
ftpcontrolsocket.cpp:105:1: error: expected initializer before ‘}’ token
};
^
ftpcontrolsocket.cpp:105:1: error: expected declaration before ‘}’ token
Makefile:667: recipe for target 'libengine_a-ftpcontrolsocket.o' failed
I understand that which is why I'm using this for personal use on a server that for some reason, HAS to use PRET.botg wrote:There's no formal and consistent specification for PRET. Hence it just cannot be implemented.
Re: Patch for PRET-Support in Filezilla 3.3.3
Another issue with PRET: It does not work with IPv6. IPv6 is the future, IPv4 a thing of the past. Why are people still using it?
Re: Patch for PRET-Support in Filezilla 3.3.3
I don't know, but for the time being, I'm stuck using it. Can you please help me?botg wrote:Another issue with PRET: It does not work with IPv6. IPv6 is the future, IPv4 a thing of the past. Why are people still using it?
Re: Patch for PRET-Support in Filezilla 3.3.3
No, not on this one.
Re: Patch for PRET-Support in Filezilla 3.3.3
Never mind, I got it! Thank you for your help with everything else!botg wrote:No, not on this one.