FileZilla 3 Linux binary test

Moderator: Project members

Message
Author
User avatar
botg
Site Admin
Posts: 35558
Joined: 2004-02-23 20:49
First name: Tim
Last name: Kosse

FileZilla 3 Linux binary test

#1 Post by botg » 2004-12-17 15:27

I want to find out how difficult it is to distribute binaries under Linux.
So here's a linux binary of FileZilla 3. I would be glad if you could test it.

Requirements:
At least the following:
Linux :shock:
GTK+ >= 2.0
recent libidn, libpng and expat

If you have those libraries installed and want to try FZ3 out, try this please:
http://filezilla.sourceforge.net/snapsh ... st.tar.bz2

wxWidgets is not required, I did compile it statically into the FZ3 binary.


Please report pack if this works for you. If it doesn't work, please let me know the exact error message and what "ldd <filezillabinary>" prints.

Superracingteam
150 Opening data channel
Posts: 55
Joined: 2004-05-18 15:41

#2 Post by Superracingteam » 2004-12-17 16:43

./bin/filezilla: error while loading shared libraries: libXinerama.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I can compile and start filezilla 3 form CVS.
i have the package untarred in my home dir and wants to run it in the directory /home/myname/filezilla/

User avatar
botg
Site Admin
Posts: 35558
Joined: 2004-02-23 20:49
First name: Tim
Last name: Kosse

#3 Post by botg » 2004-12-17 16:46

./bin/filezilla: error while loading shared libraries: libXinerama.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I wonder where that dependency is coming from...

eddan
226 Transfer OK
Posts: 423
Joined: 2004-02-25 08:44
Location: Norway

#4 Post by eddan » 2004-12-17 18:43

Works like a charm here! Fedora Core 3 using Gnome. It even adopts the Gnome theme, so it blends in nicely. It also seems very quick, even now when there are alot of debug options set (atleast in the message log).

The new Site Manager is just perfect!

Thanks, BotG! Can't wait for it :)

kieran776
504 Command not implemented
Posts: 6
Joined: 2004-12-07 02:00

#5 Post by kieran776 » 2004-12-17 21:43

I upgraded everything, and it works perfectly, except a few things which I gather are still being worked on.

The interface is awesome. Quick connect works great. I have had a chance to test uploads/downloads yet, but I will eventually.

Great work botg, keep it up :)
kieran776

ManfredU
500 Syntax error
Posts: 15
Joined: 2004-09-02 07:15

Re: FileZilla 3 Linux binary test

#6 Post by ManfredU » 2004-12-18 23:55

botg wrote:I want to find out how difficult it is to distribute binaries under Linux.
So here's a linux binary of FileZilla 3. I would be glad if you could test it.
[...]
Please report pack if this works for you. If it doesn't work, please let me know the exact error message and what "ldd <filezillabinary>" prints.
Ubuntu Warty: ./filezilla: error while loading shared libraries: libXinerama.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

$ ldd filezilla
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x40021000)
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x402d9000)
libatk-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 (0x40346000)
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 (0x40364000)
libpangoxft-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so.0 (0x4037a000)
libpangox-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0 (0x4037f000)
libpango-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 (0x4038a000)
libgobject-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 (0x403bf000)
libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (0x403f6000)
libgthread-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 (0x403fa000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 (0x40400000)
libglib-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x40410000)
libXinerama.so.1 => not found
libXxf86vm.so.1 => not found
libpng.so.3 => not found
libexpat.so.0 => /usr/lib/libexpat.so.0 (0x4048b000)
libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x404a9000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2 (0x404ba000)
libidn.so.11 => /usr/lib/libidn.so.11 (0x404bd000)
libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x404eb000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libm.so.6 (0x405a5000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x405c9000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0x405d2000)
libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x40705000)
libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0x407c6000)
libXi.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x407ca000)
libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x407d2000)
libXft.so.2 => /usr/lib/libXft.so.2 (0x407e0000)
libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0x407f2000)
libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0x4085b000)
libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0x40881000)
libXrender.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x4088a000)
libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 (0x40893000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)

Shootfirst?later
504 Command not implemented
Posts: 11
Joined: 2004-03-28 03:03
Location: Canada

Re: FileZilla 3 Linux binary test

#7 Post by Shootfirst?later » 2004-12-29 09:18

botg wrote:I want to find out how difficult it is to distribute binaries under Linux.
So here's a linux binary of FileZilla 3. I would be glad if you could test it.

Requirements:
At least the following:
Linux :shock:
GTK+ >= 2.0
recent libidn, libpng and expat

If you have those libraries installed and want to try FZ3 out, try this please:
http://filezilla.sourceforge.net/snapsh ... st.tar.bz2

wxWidgets is not required, I did compile it statically into the FZ3 binary.


Please report pack if this works for you. If it doesn't work, please let me know the exact error message and what "ldd <filezillabinary>" prints.
It works for me on SuSE 9.2 Pro

I have only been using it for 5-10 minutes so far. When I tried downloading a Nightly-Trunk build from ftp.mozilla.org or ftpmoz.newaol.com ,it was a game of whats behind door number 2, in knowing build it is.

/edit: Yes I realize you said "DO NOT complain about it" ...

/edit: Bleh.. being tired at time, I did not notice that I could just drag the Filename box bigger :lol:
Last edited by Shootfirst?later on 2005-01-09 06:03, edited 1 time in total.

stevo32
500 Command not understood
Posts: 1
Joined: 2004-12-31 22:04
Location: Canada

libXinerama.so.1

#8 Post by stevo32 » 2004-12-31 22:08

libXinerama.so.1 is from X.org. Some distro's seem to have back-ported it to XFree86, although the only major one that has done this would be SuSE. So currently people using XFree86 and not X.org need to compile from CVS.

derf
550 File not found
Posts: 33
Joined: 2004-03-22 01:10
Location: Montréal, QC

#9 Post by derf » 2005-01-01 00:43

libXinerama.so.1 sarted to be used in XFree86 4.4.0 (and X.org is based on something like 4.3.99 or something like that, so it is present in both) if I'm not mistaken, it is for dual display.

User avatar
botg
Site Admin
Posts: 35558
Joined: 2004-02-23 20:49
First name: Tim
Last name: Kosse

#10 Post by botg » 2005-01-01 01:33

The only component which uses libXinerama is wxDisplay, though I'm currently not using that class. So for future binary releses, I think I can safely compile wxWidgets without wxDisplay support.

User avatar
ICeDX
500 Command not understood
Posts: 5
Joined: 2005-01-06 09:07
Location: /home/brandon

Gentoo Linux Tested

#11 Post by ICeDX » 2005-01-06 09:09

Works in Gentoo Linux...

I have Gnome Libraries, GTK1 and GTK2 as well as wxGTK.

I don't know about the others but I didn't get any errors.


Excellent work on the Linux port. It looks close to being complete functionality wise too. Great, since I'm tired of using gftp, and I loved filezilla from my windows days.
Three murders, multiple gunshot wounds with a Glock 9. Civil Protection be advised, pacify.

User avatar
botg
Site Admin
Posts: 35558
Joined: 2004-02-23 20:49
First name: Tim
Last name: Kosse

Re: Gentoo Linux Tested

#12 Post by botg » 2005-01-06 09:46

ICeDX wrote:Excellent work on the Linux port. It looks close to being complete functionality wise too
You have no idea, FZ3 isn't even half done. The ftp engine itself is almost complete, but all the interface stuff is still missing.

Jeffrey
500 Command not understood
Posts: 1
Joined: 2005-01-06 12:50

#13 Post by Jeffrey » 2005-01-06 12:58

Also works on Gentoo Linux unstable without doing anything special.

User avatar
ICeDX
500 Command not understood
Posts: 5
Joined: 2005-01-06 09:07
Location: /home/brandon

reary?

#14 Post by ICeDX » 2005-01-06 15:22

Gentoo unstable?

Don't you mean Debian?

Gentoo is already bleeding edge
Last edited by ICeDX on 2005-01-06 15:40, edited 1 time in total.
Three murders, multiple gunshot wounds with a Glock 9. Civil Protection be advised, pacify.

User avatar
ICeDX
500 Command not understood
Posts: 5
Joined: 2005-01-06 09:07
Location: /home/brandon

Re: Gentoo Linux Tested

#15 Post by ICeDX » 2005-01-06 15:40

botg wrote:
ICeDX wrote:Excellent work on the Linux port. It looks close to being complete functionality wise too
You have no idea, FZ3 isn't even half done. The ftp engine itself is almost complete, but all the interface stuff is still missing.
still owns gftp :)
Three murders, multiple gunshot wounds with a Glock 9. Civil Protection be advised, pacify.

Post Reply