Introducing NOP on command PORT #2

Need help with FileZilla Server? Something does not work as expected? In this forum you may find an answer.

Moderator: Project members

Post Reply
500 Command not understood
Posts: 2
Joined: 2020-09-21 19:21
First name: Pierre
Last name: LAURENT

Introducing NOP on command PORT #2

#1 Post by POLAURENT » 2020-09-23 11:57

thanks @botg for your answer ,

Introducing NOP on command PORT - FileZilla Forums viewtopic.php?f=6&t=53236

you've locked the topic so i cannot answer in it, so i open a new one.

What i've asked is about to introduce a feature to correct the faulty behavior of NAT router, it doesn't seems that the RFC states that the Server should stay mute during data transfer ..

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 33308
Joined: 2004-02-23 20:49
First name: Tim
Last name: Kosse

Re: Introducing NOP on command PORT #2

#2 Post by botg » 2020-09-24 14:49

RFC 959 mandates that the client cannot send actual data over the control connection while a transfer is ongoing.

User avatar
Posts: 25384
Joined: 2006-05-01 03:28
Location: Germany

Re: Introducing NOP on command PORT #2

#3 Post by boco » 2020-09-24 17:26

I'm pretty sure the same is true for FTP server software. An FTP server can only react to client requests, it must never send any data entirely on its own.

You already identified the router as the faulty device. Here's where you should start fixing.
No support requests per PM! You will NOT get any reply!!!
FTP connection problems? Do yourself a favor and read Network Configuration.
FileZilla connection test:

Post Reply