Mirror Sync
Moderator: Project members
Mirror Sync
Is there any way to sync a folder with files in via a mirror sync like you can do in WinSCP? If not will it be supported soon? Filezilla speeds are so much faster than WinSCP but I need the mirror sync function or it is almost useless to me.
Re: Mirror Sync
FileZilla does not support automatic sync. And it does not support server-to-server transfers, either.
Isn't that strange? FTP support in WinSCP is based on FileZilla AFAIK.Filezilla speeds are so much faster than WinSCP
No support requests over PM! You will NOT get any reply!!!
FTP connection problems? Please read Network Configuration.
FileZilla connection test: https://filezilla-project.org/conntest.php
FileZilla Pro support: https://customerforum.fileZilla-project.org
FTP connection problems? Please read Network Configuration.
FileZilla connection test: https://filezilla-project.org/conntest.php
FileZilla Pro support: https://customerforum.fileZilla-project.org
Re: Mirror Sync
Last time I checked, WinSCP used the old 2.x codebase of FileZilla.
Re: Mirror Sync
Ok, thanks for clearing that up for me. Do you think it will be supported in the future? Are there currently any plans to do so? I know it can be done if it is already implemented in WinSCP.boco wrote:FileZilla does not support automatic sync. And it does not support server-to-server transfers, either.
Isn't that strange? FTP support in WinSCP is based on FileZilla AFAIK.Filezilla speeds are so much faster than WinSCP
I am not sure why Filezilla is faster than WinSCP but it is by a good margin too.
So, this could be why it is slower? If it was updated to a newer codebase it could possibly be faster?botg wrote:Last time I checked, WinSCP used the old 2.x codebase of FileZilla.
Re: Mirror Sync
Possibly. Can't tell without actually doing it.jdantzler wrote:So, this could be why it is slower? If it was updated to a newer codebase it could possibly be faster?