Moderator: Project members
-
botg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 35857
- Joined: 2004-02-23 20:49
- First name: Tim
- Last name: Kosse
#2
Post
by botg » 2016-11-30 08:59
Did you chance compiler or linker flags? It looks like it tries to do link-time optimizations (lto).
-
GetA_GetB
- 500 Command not understood
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 2016-11-30 03:47
#3
Post
by GetA_GetB » 2016-12-01 21:42
I will try in the near future to give an answer.
And yet the question.
Why do not you support the Intel C ++ Compiler?
-
botg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 35857
- Joined: 2004-02-23 20:49
- First name: Tim
- Last name: Kosse
#4
Post
by botg » 2016-12-01 22:03
The Intel compiler is too expensive.
-
GetA_GetB
- 500 Command not understood
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 2016-11-30 03:47
#5
Post
by GetA_GetB » 2016-12-01 22:09
Why not give the right choice?
Those who can afford ICC and for those who can not?
-
botg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 35857
- Joined: 2004-02-23 20:49
- First name: Tim
- Last name: Kosse
#6
Post
by botg » 2016-12-01 23:18
Let's put it this way: The rich kids can submit patches that add the missing support for icc.
