Have the feeling that everybody is staring at you in the other forums? Then look here, in this forum nobody does care what you say
![Wink ;-)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Moderator: Project members
-
lechatnoir
- 503 Bad sequence of commands
- Posts: 20
- Joined: 2005-10-03 13:25
#1
Post
by lechatnoir » 2005-12-01 15:23
Hi Tim,
I've used a lot of ftp client and yours is my prefered (until I release my own client on Mac plateforme
![Smile :-)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
).
I've noticed that yours is very quick in its transfers.
Why ?
Could you briefly explain the method or strategy you retain in your code to accelerate the transfert process ?
Thanks for your answer, it could help me to build an FTP client as fast as yours.
See you !
LeChatNoir
-
eddan
- 226 Transfer OK
- Posts: 423
- Joined: 2004-02-25 08:44
- Location: Norway
#2
Post
by eddan » 2005-12-01 15:34
Remember that FileZilla 3 (next version, a complete rewrite - read the development diary for progress updates) will (probably) also run on MacOS
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
-
lechatnoir
- 503 Bad sequence of commands
- Posts: 20
- Joined: 2005-10-03 13:25
#3
Post
by lechatnoir » 2005-12-01 20:32
Yes I know FZ3 will run on Mac.
Actually, it already runs ! I've already compiled it.
But I want to make my own app just for learn Cocoa API. And so I'de like to build my FTP client on a good transfert algoritme.
I could reuse FileZilla code but it's hard to partially port it on an app written in Cocoa...
So I hope Tim will take few minutes to light my soul
![Smile :-)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
LeChatNoir
-
Ernetas
- 500 Command not understood
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 2005-12-28 14:55
#4
Post
by Ernetas » 2005-12-28 15:02
Oh... I can belive you, because I am using Total Commander 6.53 and it's much faster than FileZilla
![Twisted Evil :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
-
botg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 35650
- Joined: 2004-02-23 20:49
- First name: Tim
- Last name: Kosse
#5
Post
by botg » 2005-12-28 18:15
I'm not doing anything special, no clue where the percieved speed is coming from.
-
Biker
- 500 Command not understood
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 2006-02-06 19:08
#6
Post
by Biker » 2006-03-29 03:07
Due to less GUI the ftp client has more room to operate for instence, smart ftp, is slow right? thats because it has alot more GUI than this programe.
-
sammie99
- 504 Command not implemented
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 2006-05-26 02:20
- Location: UK
#7
Post
by sammie99 » 2006-06-28 03:26
smartftp only has one connection at a time, FZ has as many as you can use at once, so in effect sending 10 files at once, to smartftp's one
= 10 times faster huh?
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
-
botg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 35650
- Joined: 2004-02-23 20:49
- First name: Tim
- Last name: Kosse
#8
Post
by botg » 2006-06-28 08:38
It's not that simple, but it could be one of the many reasaons.
-
thorin
- 550 Permission denied
- Posts: 24
- Joined: 2004-03-12 14:02
- Location: Canada
#9
Post
by thorin » 2006-08-09 18:28
Could this be related to the transfer compression in FZ?
Codito, Ergo Sum
-
ZZZ182
- 500 Command not understood
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 2006-10-21 06:06
#10
Post
by ZZZ182 » 2006-10-21 06:18
huh .. i tried filezilla, but it's not faster....
only in very crowded ftp's, but still it's only a bit faster
-
danopia
- 226 Transfer OK
- Posts: 70
- Joined: 2006-09-09 15:27
- Location: POSTS_TABLE Posts: 9999999999999 Smart: Of course! ;)
#11
Post
by danopia » 2006-12-03 20:28
Compared to IE, FileZilla is lightning. My dad forgot a CD full of pictures, I used FileZillaServer and he used IE, we transfered about 10 pics in a half hours. Then, he downloaded FileZilla Client and the pics were flying down the internet and even logged me out of AIM once by stealing all the bandwidth.
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
The rest of the CD went in another half hour (>500 MB).
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
If all else fails, read the instructions.
![Image](http://danopia.no-ip.org:8080/sigs/phpbb2.jpg)